|
Canada-AB-CALGARY Azienda Directories
|
Azienda News:
- Aires Rodrigues vs State Of Goa Thr. Chief Secretary And 2 . . . on 16 . . .
Aires Rodrigues vs State Of Goa Thr Chief Secretary And 2 on 16 July, 2024 18 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WP NO 18 OF 2022 AIRES RODRIGUES PETITIONER Versus STATE OF GOA THR CHIEF SECRETARY AND 2 ORS RESPONDENTS None for the Petitioner Mr Deep Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate for R-2 CORAM:- M S KARNIK VALMIKI MENEZES, JJ
- ADV. AIRES RODRIGUES. v. STATE OF GOA, BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
In the background, therefore, the Hon'ble Governor has issued and Wp no 180 2017 published the Extraordinary Official Government Gazette Series No 47 dated 26 2 2017 summoned the Legislative Assembly which is marked 'X" for identification and which reads as under: "Notification No LA Legn 2017 2459 The following order of the Governor of Goa dated 25th February, 2017 is hereby published for general information: "Order In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (1) of Article 174 of the
- Adv. Aires Rodrigues v s State of Goa Others - LexTechSuite
In the case of S P Chaudhuri vs State of Punjab and others 2001 (7) SCC 126, the Supreme Court while dealing with Articles 164(1) and 164(4) of the Constitution observed vide paragraphs 33 and 38 as under:-"33 Constitutional provisions are required to be understood and interpreted with an object-oriented approach
- A Collection of Latin Maxims Rules, by Peter Halkerston | Project . . .
A digniori fieri debet denominatio et resolutio Title and acquittal ought to proceed from the more worthy person and it is the interest of the state that there be limits to law suits Bonus judex secundum æquum et bonum judicat, et æquitatem stricto juri præfert A good judge decides according to what is just and good; and prefers equity to strict law and that is considered a chief point, which has a reference to species In verbis non verba sed res et ratio quærenda est In
- Aires Rodrigues vs State of Goa others - 2002 0 Supreme(Bom) 941
This petition filed in public interest by a practising Lawyer of the State of Goa, takes exception to the Notification dated 23-5-2001, appointing the second respondent as Chairman of the Goa Public Service Commission (hereinafter, for the sake of brevity, referred to as 'G P S C ') with effect from the date of his taking charge and the notification dated 2-7-2001, appointing respondent No 3 as a Member of the G P S C from the date of his taking charge
- Aires Rodrigues v. State Of Goa | Bombay High Court - CaseMine
The issues which arise in this matter are: (1) whether s 501(3) of the Act is valid in its application to the prosecutor; (2) whether, as a matter of statutory construction, the Parliamentary Secretary is the “Minister personally” for the purposes of s 501(4) of the Act; (3) if the Parliamentary Secretary is “the Minister personally”, whether she has been validly appointed as one of the Queen's Ministers of State for the Commonwealth; (4) whether the decision of the Parliamentary
- Sessions Court quashes conviction of Aires Rodrigues - oHeraldo
Allowing the appeal filed by Adv Rodrigues, the Additional Sessions Judge Sharmila Patil in her 19-page judgment while holding that the JMFC’s order was perverse and illegal has ruled that the JMFC erred in rendering findings on the incriminating circumstances, which were not put to Adv Rodrigues while recording his statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC)
- Aires Rodrigues vs Vishwajeet P Rane on 10 January, 2017 - Indian Kanoon
The question raised before the High Court was whether notification issued under Section 10 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1932 (a Central Legislation), declaring Sections 186, 188, 189, 228, 295-A, 298, 505 or 507 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (45 of 1860) when committed in the Union Territory of Goa (now State), Daman and Diu, to be cognizable and Sections 188 or 506 of the I P C to be non-bailable when committed, in the said territory
- AIRES RODRIGUES Vs. STATE - the-laws. com
aires rodrigues vs state - high court of bombay (from: panaji) - april 12, 2010 aires rodrigues vs state laws(bom)-2010-4-34 high court of bombay (from: panaji) decided on april 12,2010 aires rodrigues appellant versus state respondents referred judgements :-hindustan lever limited vs ashok vishnu kate [referred to] sakiri vasu vs state of u p [referred to] dabur india ltd vs k r industries [referred to] mahesh kumar vs
- 1-year jail sentence for Adv Aires Rodrigues - The Goan EveryDay
Rodrigues has decided to challenge the order before the High Court of Bombay at Goa The matter pertains to a complaint filed by the woman accusing him of defaming her The police registered an FIR against Rodrigues on November 27, 2017, at the Anjuna Police Station and within a week, transferred the case to the Crime Branch
|
|