|
Canada-ON-LONDON Azienda Directories
|
Azienda News:
- Cryptocurrency and the Family Court: Issues Arising from Digital Asset . . .
Add-backs are ‘exceptional’ The FCFCOA may make an order for an add-back where the cryptocurrency investment has failed and caused dissipation of assets In Powell v Christensen, the de facto husband was found to have purchased cryptocurrency on behalf of the parties’ joint business for around $75,000 00 Despite arguing that the value
- Crypto Assets and Family Law: Case Studies
The court found that the husband had wasted joint funds on speculative investments without informing the wife and included the $100,000 lost in Bitcoin as an add-back in the asset pool, attributing this amount to the husband Conclusion Cryptocurrency assets introduce significant complexities into Family Law proceedings
- Bitcoin in Australian Family Law Cases - Carter Dickens
In accordance with Rule 13 04 of the Family Law Rules 2004 and Regulation 24 03 of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, parties engaged in family law proceedings are mandated to offer full and transparent disclosure of all relevant matters, including cryptocurrency holdings However, the challenge arises when one party refuses to disclose their cryptocurrency assets, potentially leaving the
- Cryptocurrency and Family Law in Australia - Law By Dan
One notable legal case is Powell v Christensen [2020] FamCA 944, a landmark Australian family law case involving the division of cryptocurrency assets between separated spouses This case highlights the need for clear legal frameworks and guidelines to address issues such as asset valuation, taxation, and division in the context of digital assets
- Cryptocurrency, NFTs, and Digital Assets in Family Law Settlements
The availability of smartphone apps for cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets means an increased number of Australian taxpayers are now accessing this new and emerging form of investment In recent years, Australia’s family law courts have at the trial level commonly treated digital assets, particularly cryptocurrency, as property
- Cryptocurrency and Family Law - Farrar Gesini Dunn
The case law surrounding this concept stems in part from examining the ‘source’ of the funds used for expenditures such as legal fees (NHC v RCH) or in this case cryptocurrency purchases If the funds existed at the time of separation, both parties can be seen as having an interest in the way they were used post-separation and they should arguably be ‘added back’ to the pool (Powell
- Understanding Cryptocurrency in Australian Family Law
Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth) While there are additional potential ‘backup’ and recovery options to allow access to crypto wallets even after a key or USB has been lost (such as mnemonic seeds), this article does not intend to address those specifics See also Woodward Woodward [2023
- Family Law Property Settlements and Cryptocurrency
Valuing cryptocurrency for a family law property settlement The value of cryptocurrency can be converted into dollars using a conventional exchange rate In recent years, the cryptocurrency’s value has exhibited extreme fluctuations, with some instances of 20% drops occurring within a few hours
- Understanding Cryptocurrency In Family Law | The Family Lawyer
In 2017, cryptocurrency was sanctioned legally in Australia, with the Australian government classifying cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin as property under the law, thereby making them subject to Capital Gains Tax Valuation of Cryptocurrency for Property Settlements Cryptocurrencies are exchangeable for standard currencies at an exchange rate
- Cryptocurrency in Family Law Property Settlements
In light of the above, Justice Gendall concluded that cryptocurrency should be considered property Past Family Law Cases Dealing with Cryptocurrency In the Australian family law case of Powell and Christensen [2020] FamCA 944, the Court dealt with the husband’s cryptocurrency as a form of add-back to the final property settlement The facts
|
|