MTZION,USAAnnuari commerciali , directory aziendali

python - How do I make a time delay? - Stack Overflow
If you use Tkinter, do not use time sleep(), because it will muck up your program This happened to me Instead, use root after() and replace the values for however many seconds, with a milliseconds For example, time sleep(1) is equivalent to root after(1000) in Tkinter
sleep - Correct way to pause a Python program - Stack Overflow
So you register a handler for the signal SIGINT and pause waiting for any signal Now from outside your program (e g in bash), you can run kill -2 <python_pid>, which will send signal 2 (i e SIGINT) to your python program Your program will call your registered handler and proceed running
Python: high precision time. sleep - Stack Overflow
time sleep(0 5) will sleep for half a second In practice, however, it's unlikely that you will get much more than millisecond precision with sleep because operating systems usually only support millisecond sleeps and because very short amounts of time quickly get unreliable
How do I get my program to sleep for 50 milliseconds?
sleep Sleep asks the program to wait, and then to do the rest of the code There are two ways to use sleep: import time # Import whole time module print("0 00 seconds") time sleep(0 05) # 50 milliseconds make sure you put time if you import time! print("0 05 seconds") The second way doesn't import the whole module, but it just sleep
Accurately sleep () for less than a second in python
then you can call it like this busy_sleep(0 005) and it will "sleep" almost exactly 0 005 seconds "sleep" is in air quotes since you aren't really sleeping you're keeping the cpu busy all this time at 100% but if what's important for you is to delay execution in a precise manner it could still work for you
Delay between for loop iteration (python) - Stack Overflow
Is this possible in Python? I wrote a great loop script in Python and I’d like to add this delay to it if at all possible
How accurate is pythons time. sleep ()? - Stack Overflow
Logic: time sleep() has poor precision < 5ms, so given a time window (e g 1 second) it splits the remaining time into remaining_time 2, cutting the sleep time in half every iteration When it gets to < 20ms, it moves to a while loop (CPU-intensive), and then breaks when < 0ms remaining
python - asyncio. sleep () vs time. sleep () - Stack Overflow
You aren't seeing anything special because there's nothing much asynchronous work in your code However, the main difference is that time sleep(5) is blocking, and asyncio sleep(5) is non-blocking