|
Canada-MB-WANIPIGOW Azienda Directories
|
Azienda News:
- *. h or *. hpp for your C++ headers class definitions
another convention is to use h for C headers and hpp for C++; a good example would be the boost library Quote from Boost FAQ, File extensions communicate the "type" of the file, both to humans and to computer programs The ' h' extension is used for C header files, and therefore communicates the wrong thing about C++ header files
- Should I include lt;xxxx. h gt; or lt;cxxxx gt; in C++ programs?
-1 re "we are not polluting the global namespace", you have just quoted and discussed that this is not the case so a bit of self-contradiction it is important because it directly affects the conclusion of what is best practice your conclusion above is wrong it is weird you first discuss why it's a bad choice (possibility of code not working across compilers, unintended namespace
- c++ - . c vs . cc vs. . cpp vs . hpp vs . h vs . cxx - Stack Overflow
* h or * hpp for your class definitions What is the difference between cc and cpp file suffix? I used to think that it used to be that: h files are header files for C and C++, and usually only contain declarations c files are C source code cpp files are C++ source code (which can also be C source code)
- 酷睿Ultra 9 285H VS 锐龙AI 9 365，怎么选？ - 知乎
不过，说句实话，咱们真的有必要买Ultra 9和AI 9处理器嘛？Ultra 5不香么？干啥需要那么激进呢，特别是打算买轻薄本的，建议再琢磨下，有没有必要
- c++ - #include in . h or . c . cpp? - Stack Overflow
In callback h you should include everything needed to compile against it But nothing more But nothing more Consider whether using forward declarations in your header file (such as class GtkButton; ) will suffice, allowing you to reduce the number of #include directives in the header (and, in turn, my compilation time and complexity)
|
|