|
- Why did Super-VGA offer the 5:4 1280×1024 resolution?
@Jonathan The 1280x1024 5:4 aspect ratio display, with a square pixels, only became a thing with 1280x1024 5:4 aspect ratio LCD panels On 4:3 aspect ratio CRTs, 1280x1024 has non-square pixels This was actually a problem for games, since 1280x1024 could be displayed on either a 5:4 or 4:3 display and there was no way to infer which was the case
- Whats the deal with the 1280x1024 res? - AnandTech Forums
Try 1280x960 and you'll instantly notice the difference Indeed, just scan in any picture and then hold it up to the screen and compare it AT 1280x1024 the image will be distorted on 4:3 CRT Then do the same at 1024x768 or 1280x960 Then you'll know what I'm talking about Remember though that 1280x1024 is the proper resolution for some LCD
- Which is the PROPER 4:3 resolution: 1280 x 960 or 1280 x 1040 . . .
The spec of 85Hz at 1280x1024 is the _vertical_ refresh rate Thus, I'd assume since 1400x1050 is hardly larger than 1280x1024 in vertical dimensions, I'd say you're safe to try 85Hz at that res However, the horizontal rate will be somewhat lower at 1400x1050 than it will be at 1280x1024 (I'm not sure how much that contributes to a noticable
- Is 1280 x 1024 High Definition? - AnandTech Forums
Except that for his monitor, it can not show a 1080p signal It will say something like "Resolution out of bounds" or some similar message because it can not display 1920x1080 on 1280x1024 It is like trying to pour 4 gallons of water into a 1 gallon jug, it just doesn't fit 720p is what you should set any device you connect to this monitor
- How does a 1440x900 screen compare to 1280x1024?
I currently work on a 1280x1024 screen resolution and I am looking into getting a new notebook I have seen a lot of models with the 1440x900 screen and I am not sure how they compare I mean, it will have more lines horizontally but less lines vertically? Will my desktop space expand or decrease? Thing will look bigger or smaller? Thanks so much,
- why 1280 x 1024 and not 1280 x 960? - AnandTech Forums
1280x1024 LCD screens ARE 5:4 aspect ratio, so it's correct with those On CRTs, it isn't However, back when all that stuff evolved, some airhead decided that the next step up from 1024x768 is to be 1280x1024, for whatever reason - possibly to not waste any of the two megabytes of display RAM these cards had
- 1280x1024@120Hz vertical refresh rate monitors? only 4 options?
Edit: a monitor capable of 2048x1536@75Hz must be able to read at least 700 million samples sec from the PC, and should easily be capable of doing 1280x1024@120Hz (although there could be other restrictions within the monitor that prevent such operation -- maybe, for instance, the vertical refresh is limited to 100Hz regardless of resolution)
- 1280x1024@85Hz is it a resonal resolution for 17 CRT?
Lets help kill 1280x1024 once and for all, 1280x960 is the proper resolution for a 4:3 monitor The only problem with 1280x960 on 17" is that most 17" monitors aren't really good enough(too low refresh rate, and not good enough sharpness) But if your monitor can handle it, why not
|
|
|