|
- Bismarck´s un ending arguments - Naval History Forums
Ok: One theory, in favor of Bismarck, came from the myths surrounding her and from books like the baron´s and others The other theory came from positions like Jon Parshall´s Combined Fleet and such that state, without hesitation, that Bismarck was a mediocre Battleship
- Bismarck: Scuttled or Sunk? - Page 2 - Naval History Forums
The cavity magnetron was invented four or five different times, entirely independently At around the time the Tizard mission was protecting their prize with armed guards, some Soviet guy was publishing his version in a trade journal
- Bismarck: Scuttled or Sunk? - Page 4 - Naval History Forums
Bismarck General Discussion Bismarck: Scuttled or Sunk? Discussions about the history of the ship
- How close was the final battle? - Page 2 - Naval History Forums
Firing broadside, or nearly so, almost always leads to better results This was exacerbated by Bismarck's general lack of maneuverability, which likely put her more at the mercy of the seas than the surrounding British vessels Except in calm waters, higher speed does tend to be correlated with an increased stability of the gun platform
- atlantic bow. . . - Naval History Forums - KBismarck. org
Battleship Bismarck Forums; ↳ Bismarck General Discussion; ↳ Bismarck Crewmember Research; ↳ The Wreck of the Bismarck; Naval History Forums; ↳ Naval History in General; ↳ The Age of Sail (1571-1860) ↳ The Ironclad Pre-dreadnought Era (1860-1905) ↳ The Dreadnought Era (1906-1921) ↳ Naval History (1922-1945)
- Bismarck´s un ending arguments - Page 2 - Naval History Forums
Karl Heidenreich wrote: One thing though: Was 7 knots the best that Bismarck could do or was a desicion to maintain that speed? Hi Karl, I seem to recall from the Baron's book that the speed of 7 knots was chosen, after it became clear that the ship was unmanoeuvrable, to offset the effect of the fairly heavy sea and to ensure that the ship
- Redesigning Bismarck - Naval History Forums
For example, Bismarck's belt had a lower tapering section reducing from 320 mm to 170 mm If we stretch that tapered plate by 1 metre, it costs for a 170 metre length 170 x 2 x 0 25 x 8 or 680 tons (assuming a specific gravity of 8 and an average thickness of 250 mm)
- Bismarck´s un ending arguments - Page 3 - Naval History Forums
In this sense it seems logical that the Bayern-Baden Class is, in many ways, the "ancestor" of the Bismarck In what I don´t agree is the statement that it was the "purpose" of the designers to "rebuilt" the previous design with modifications due to new developments
|
|
|