|
- Creating a generic method in C# - Stack Overflow
I am trying to combine a bunch of similar methods into a generic method I have several methods that return the value of a querystring, or null if that querystring does not exist or is not in the
- java - How to Map to Generic Type? - Stack Overflow
Mapstruct is a code generator So it needs to know which types to construct in order to generate a method implementation Having said that, you could do this smarter by using a base mapping method on which you define all the @Mapping annotations and ignore the generic type mapping You still have the methods above but you just specify @InheritConfiguration Alternatively you could consider
- Nullable type as a generic parameter possible? - Stack Overflow
The type 'int?' must be a non-nullable value type in order to use it as parameter 'T' in the generic type or method Is specifying a nullable type as a generic parameter at all possible?
- c# compare two generic values - Stack Overflow
You cannot use operators on generic types (except for foo == null which is special cased) unless you add where T : class to indicate it is a reference type (then foo == bar is legal) Use EqualityComparer<T> Default to do it for you This will not work on types which only supply an operator overload for == without also either: implement IEquatable<T> overrides object Equals () In general
- Generic Web Api controller to support any model - Stack Overflow
Is it possible to have a generic web api that will support any model in your project? class BaseApiController<T> :ApiController { private IRepository<T> _repository; inject
- c# - How to compare values of generic types? - Stack Overflow
So, two questions: Why do we observe this weird behaviour? What keeps us from comparing the values of generic types which are known to be IComparable? Doesn't it somehow defeat the entire purpose of generic constraints? How do I resolve this, or at least work around it?
- How do I get the type name of a generic type argument?
In the case that there is a generic type constraint (the "where") then this type of code can be safe since we know the constructor and may actually have reasons to instantiate the type
- exception - Generic catch for python - Stack Overflow
Generic catch for python Asked 16 years, 5 months ago Modified 5 years, 1 month ago Viewed 133k times
|
|
|