|
- DECISION - adrforum. com
The disputed domain name resolves to a web site that displays Complainant’s INVESCO mark and offers products and services similar to those offered by Complainant DISCUSSION Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs this Panel to "decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted in accordance with the Policy, these Rules
- Invesco Ltd. v Rubena Lowe I sell domains! Please contact me directly!
Complainant and its affiliates have used INVESCO and related marks to promote their services since at least as early as 1979 Complainant holds numerous trademark registrations for INVESCO and related marks in the United States and other countries worldwide The disputed domain name <invescofunds com> was registered on July 11, 2008
- DECISION - ADR Forum
See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ”); see also Summit Group, LLC v
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ”) Complainant provides screenshots of the resolving webpage of the disputed domain name which Complainant
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
DECISION Google LLC v David B Dennis Jr Claim Number: FA2004001893200 PARTIES Complainant is Google LLC (“Complainant”), represented by Brendan J Hughes of Cooley LLP, District of Columbia, United States
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
See Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (" Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
Invesco Ltd v Premanshu Rana, FA 1733167 (Forum July 10, 2017) (“Use of a domain name to divert Internet users to a competing website is not a bona fide offering of goods or services or a legitimate noncommercial or fair use ”) The evidence furnished by Complainant establishes the required prima facie case
- NATIONAL ARBITRATION FORUM
DECISION Nasdaq, Inc v 钟 绍锐 竟源工作室 Claim Number: FA2109001963222 PARTIES Complainant is Nasdaq, Inc (“Complainant”), represented by Monica
|
|
|