|
- c# - What is LINQ and what does it do? - Stack Overflow
LINQ To Entities - examine the System Data Objects namespace Especially note the ObjectContext This is a DataAccess technology built by the ADO NET team It is complex, powerful, and harder to use than LINQ To SQL LINQ To XML - examine the System Xml Linq namespace Essentially, people weren't satisfied with the stuff in System Xml So
- c# - Proper LINQ where clauses - Stack Overflow
When this is a linq-to-object call, multiple where clauses will lead to a chain of IEnumerables that read from each other Using the single-clause form will help performance here When the underlying provider translates it into a SQL statement, the chances are good that both variants will create the same statement
- LINQ Where with AND OR condition - Stack Overflow
LINQ select with more than one condition using OR 1 Linq Where Clause 'AND' 'OR' Hot Network Questions
- If condition in LINQ Where clause - Stack Overflow
This is how can you can do it with the noob Linq syntax This applies the condition3 only if condition2 is false If condition2 is true, you are essentially doing true which has no effect on the where clause So it is essentially doing this:
- c# - Where IN clause in LINQ - Stack Overflow
The "IN" clause is built into linq via the Contains() method For example, to get all People whose
- Sort list in C# with LINQ - Stack Overflow
Well, the simplest way using LINQ would be something like this: list = list OrderBy(x => x AVC ? 0 : 1) ToList(); or list = list OrderByDescending(x => x AVC) ToList(); I believe that the natural ordering of bool values is false < true, but the first form makes it clearer IMO, because everyone knows that 0 < 1
- c# - If Else in LINQ - Stack Overflow
Is it possible to use If Else conditional in a LINQ query? Something like from p in db products if p price gt;0 select new { Owner=from q in db Users select q Name } else select new {
- Linq: adding conditions to the where clause conditionally
Just to add to the above accepted answer here, if you are doing a dynamic search on a join, consider to return a new object with both tables (t1,t2) in the initial linq query so you can access them individually to do the conditional search
|
|
|