|
- Meaning of list[-1] in Python - Stack Overflow
I have a piece of code here that is supposed to return the least common element in a list of elements, ordered by commonality: def getSingle(arr): from collections import Counter c = Counte
- Python: list of lists - Stack Overflow
The first, [:], is creating a slice (normally often used for getting just part of a list), which happens to contain the entire list, and thus is effectively a copy of the list The second, list(), is using the actual list type constructor to create a new list which has contents equal to the first list
- slice - How slicing in Python works - Stack Overflow
The first way works for a list or a string; the second way only works for a list, because slice assignment isn't allowed for strings Other than that I think the only difference is speed: it looks like it's a little faster the first way Try it yourself with timeit timeit () or preferably timeit repeat ()
- Remove list from list in Python - Stack Overflow
Possible Duplicate: Get difference from two lists in Python What is a simplified way of doing this? I have been trying on my own, and I can't figure it out list a and list b, the new list should
- Proper way to make HTML nested list? - Stack Overflow
Learn how to properly create nested HTML lists with examples and best practices, as discussed on Stack Overflow
- What is the difference between List. of and Arrays. asList?
@Sandy Chapman: List of does return some ImmutableList type, its actual name is just a non-public implementation detail If it was public and someone cast it to List again, where was the difference? Where is the difference to Arrays asList, which returns a non-public List implementation, that throws an exception when attempting add or remove, or the list returned by Collections
- How to cast List lt;Object gt; to List lt;MyClass gt; - Stack Overflow
(List<Customer>)(Object)list; you must be sure that at runtime the list contains nothing but Customer objects Critics say that such casting indicates something wrong with your code; you should be able to tweak your type declarations to avoid it But Java generics is too complicated, and it is not perfect Sometimes you just don't know if there is a pretty solution to satisfy the compiler
- Find elements in one list that are not in the other [duplicate]
Are you looking for elements in list_2 that appear nowhere in list_1 or elements in list_2 that are not present at the same index in list_1?
|
|
|