|
- angular - Property . . . has no initializer and is not definitely . . .
I needed to define a property that uses an Enum in a service on an app where I can't assume the user's choices, not even a default It is defined in the first step and not read until the second, so this was very useful escape, good to know it exists, thanks very much
- Configure appropriate serialization for Windows forms
In this case it is probably also a good idea to set [Browsable(false)], which hides this property from the property editor, because edits in the property editor will not be persisted or If you want to save (i e , serialize) this property:
- Angular - How to fix property does not exist on type error?
If you want to avoid the compilation warning then the dirty fix would be to make employees: any[]; any instances allow any method to call any method on that object
- What is the difference between a field and a property?
Your answer was right before the edits and oddly-upvoted incorrect comments A property should always encapsulate one or more fields, and should never do any heavy lifting or validation If you need a property such a UserName or Password to have validation, change their type from strings to Value Objects There is an unspoken contract between a
- What is the best way to give a C# auto-property an initial value?
Voting -1: At best, it looks subjectively looks a little neater than initializing in the constructor This comes at the cost of confusing developers new to the codebase, worse performance, semantically changing the meaning of a built in attribute, only allowing constants, default values being hard to spot among multiple attributes, having to remember to run this in every constructor overload
- How to exclude property from Json Serialization - Stack Overflow
short helper class to ignore some properties from serialization public class IgnorePropertiesResolver : DefaultContractResolver { private readonly HashSet<string> ignoreProps; public IgnorePropertiesResolver(IEnumerable<string> propNamesToIgnore) { this ignoreProps = new HashSet<string>(propNamesToIgnore); } protected override JsonProperty
- Property does not exist on type never - Stack Overflow
In retrospect, from the point of view of the original question, the above example is just casting instance to any type to get a property called name and avoid never accessing The method of avoiding null with ! (bang) or the method of making the compiler not infer the type as null (getFoo) as answered by other people are also valid
- Using @property versus getters and setters - Stack Overflow
Use @property to define special behavior when attributes are accessed on your objects, if necessary Follow the rule of least surprise and avoid odd side effects in your @property methods Ensure that @property methods are fast; for slow or complex work—especially involving I O or causing side effects—use normal methods instead
|
|
|