|
- angular - Property . . . has no initializer and is not definitely . . .
As of TypeScript 2 7 2, you are required to initialise a property in the constructor if it was not assigned to at the point of declaration If you are coming from Vue, you can try the following: Add "strictPropertyInitialization": true to your tsconfig json
- Angular - How to fix property does not exist on type error?
If you want to avoid the compilation warning then the dirty fix would be to make employees: any[]; any instances allow any method to call any method on that object
- Configure appropriate serialization for Windows forms
In this case it is probably also a good idea to set [Browsable(false)], which hides this property from the property editor, because edits in the property editor will not be persisted or If you want to save (i e , serialize) this property:
- What is the difference between a field and a property?
Your answer was right before the edits and oddly-upvoted incorrect comments A property should always encapsulate one or more fields, and should never do any heavy lifting or validation If you need a property such a UserName or Password to have validation, change their type from strings to Value Objects There is an unspoken contract between a
- What is the best way to give a C# auto-property an initial value?
Voting -1: At best, it looks subjectively looks a little neater than initializing in the constructor This comes at the cost of confusing developers new to the codebase, worse performance, semantically changing the meaning of a built in attribute, only allowing constants, default values being hard to spot among multiple attributes, having to remember to run this in every constructor overload
- Whats the pythonic way to use getters and setters?
def set_property(property,value): def get_property(property): Firstly, the above doesn't work, because you don't provide an argument for the instance that the property would be set to (usually self ), which would be:
- How to exclude property from Json Serialization - Stack Overflow
short helper class to ignore some properties from serialization public class IgnorePropertiesResolver : DefaultContractResolver { private readonly HashSet<string> ignoreProps; public IgnorePropertiesResolver(IEnumerable<string> propNamesToIgnore) { this ignoreProps = new HashSet<string>(propNamesToIgnore); } protected override JsonProperty
- Overriding fields or properties in subclasses - Stack Overflow
Use an abstract Property and override it on the inherited classes This benefits from being enforced (you have to override it) and it is clean But, it feels slightly wrong to return a hard-code value rather than encapsulate a field and it is a few lines of code instead of just
|
|
|