|
- What is SEDA (Staged Event Driven Architecture)?
44 SEDA: An Architecture for Well-Conditioned, Scalable Internet Services "SEDA is an acronym for staged event-driven architecture, and decomposes a complex, event-driven application into a set of stages connected by queues " I understand that it's an architecture and that there are many implementations of SEDA (see the Wikipedia article)
- java - Camel Parked Threads - Stack Overflow
The flow from 'seda:one' to 'seda:two' is pretty quick and completes way before the other routes But even though I kill the particular route, I can still see parked threads when inspecting with visual VM
- java - Ordinary Queue vs SEDA Queue - Stack Overflow
SEDA queues are just like a regular queue (and as Peter said above, in Camel they have a thread pool associated with them as part of the component) SEDA is an architecture The SEDA component in Camel uses in-memory queues in your process and are a separate component in order to distinguish them from the other queue component in Apache camel, namely the JMS component
- Camel parallel processing options - Stack Overflow
I am working on Camel routes in RedHat Fuse Service Works which has Camel 2 10 I would like to know the differences between the following implementations: 1 using SEDA routes from("A")
- How does LMAXs disruptor pattern work? - Stack Overflow
Compared to SEDA LMAX built the Disruptor pattern to replace a SEDA based approach The main improvement that it provided over SEDA was the ability to do work in parallel To do this the Disruptor supports multi-casting the same messages (in the same order) to multiple consumers This avoids the need for fork stages in the pipeline
- java - Connect to Camel- SEDA queue - Stack Overflow
The SEDA component in camel is indended as an asynchrnous internal channel This is very useful if you need to decouple message processing into multiple threads and have a more elastic implementation
- java - What is the difference between SEDA, VM and direct in Apache . . .
The SEDA and VM mechanisms both use a pool of threads on the consumer, such that each request made by the producer is assigned to one of the threads in the pool This allows the consumer endpoint and its associated routing logic to act independently of the producer
- When to use Camel Wiretap or SEDA? - Stack Overflow
An important difference between Wiretap and SEDA is that when consuming from polling consumers (e g file or ftp) only wiretap is fire-and-forget When a thread consuming from a polling consumer reaches a to(seda:xx) it will hand off the exchange and continue the route as expected or consume new exchanges from the endpoint The exchange delivered to the seda endpoint will be commited to the
|
|
|