|
- Wisconsin Recycling Trends and Behaviors - apps. dnr. wi. gov
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WISCONSIN RECYCLING TRENDS AND BEHAVIORS WASTE AND MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUB-WA-2019 2022 3 Level of commitment 97% of respondents self-reported as at least “somewhat committed” to recycling, with 75% “very” or “extremely committed ” This remains consistent with surveys since 2006
- Harvest Statistics - Wisconsin
Deer Harvest Trends: Fawn to doe ratios collected in late summer give information on fawn recruitment and survival and are used as an input into the formula for annual deer herd abundance estimation Fawn to doe ratios were summarized using groups of county deer management units
- Population Statistics - Wisconsin
Skip Navigation Links Home > Harvest - Population Trends > Population Statistics Herd Abundance Deer herd abundance is estimated annually with hunter-collected data and a mathematical model to get post hunt deer population estimates
- Deer Statistics - Wisconsin
When hunters register their deer, information is collected on the date and place of harvest and the sex of the deer The proportion of the adult buck population taken by hunters is relatively uniform from one year to the next Under such stable conditions, managers have found that buck harvest trends closely track deer population trends
- Wisconsin Recycling Trends and Behaviors Executive Summary
Trends in Wisconsin households' ownership and disposal of electronics: Results from the DNR's 2021 statewide household survey) Disposal Accessibility, Behavior, and Motivations Despite strong recycling accessibility, commitment and reasons to do so, an increasing number of respondents report barriers that largely stem from unclear or
- Harvest and Population Trends - Wisconsin
Population Statistics Trends: Fawn to doe ratios and yearling buck percentages are used to help estimate the deer herd size annually and is the starting point for setting antlerless harvest quotas
- Deer Statistics - Wisconsin
The county group FDR metric is no longer an input into the formula that is used to estimate annual deer population size by DMU but it still may be helpful to assess trends in FDR at a regional level FDRs by DMU are derived from SDO and other surveys to provide the necessary inputs to the population model and are covered in the section of this
- Wisconsin Lakes
The setup is a bit different than the previous reports, so it may take some getting used to On the plus side, this tool provides more information about the watershed, trends in water quality over time, comparisons between multiple lakes of the same type, and the ability to estimate nutrient loads to a lake
|
|
|