|
Canada-0-LibrariesPublic Azienda Directories
|
Azienda News:
- Technically Unacceptable Proposal, so no need to evaluate Price . . .
If a solicitation states that the agency reserves the right to make award without discussions, and if the agency evaluates a proposal as technically unacceptable, then the agency does not have to go on to evaluate the proposal's price, right? This is assuming that the agency is sticking with it's
- Back to Basics: Registering in SAM. gov - WIFCON. com
SAM gov, short for System for Award Management, is the entry point for federal contractors to interface with the government So, it is a basic starting point for every federal contractor But your SAM gov profile also needs to stay up to date and be up to date at time of bid submission, and failu
- Two Bids - One Technically Unacceptable - WIFCON. com
I'm doing a tradeoff best value source selection under FAR Part 16 where one of the two offerors has been determined technically unacceptable Is there a FAR reference that formally directs me what to do next to award to the remaining offeror? Do I maintain the current path, establish the competi
- Significance of Contractors Representations and Certifications
I would appreciate the opportunity to begin a general discussion of the significance of a contractor's representations and certifications throughout the whole contract management process (both pre-award and post award) Let me start off with a few brief summary of a few relevant FAR provisions: 1
- Federal Register Vol. 81, No. 223 Friday, November 18, 2016 Rules and . . .
I Background DoD, GSA, and NASA published a proposed rule in Federal Register at 81 FR 36245 on June 6, 2016, soliciting public comments on this rule, to amend the FAR to delete the use of the terms ‘‘telegram,’’ ‘‘telegraph,’’ ‘‘telegraphic,’’ and related terminology and make conforming changes to the instructions for expedited notices of termination and change orders
- No longer a Small Business but showing up in SAM. gov as Such
In renewing the SAM gov registration for the entity I work for, I noticed that under clause FAR 52 212-3: Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021) and specifically (c) (1), the box in sam gov is checked as “is” a small business concern Th
- Construction as a commercial service - About The Regulations - The . . .
RFO Part 2 now explicitly defines (at least some) construction as a commercial service Link to RFO Part 2: FAR Overhaul - Part 2 | Acquisition GOVText in question: (2) Services, including construction, of a type offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketpla
- ECMRA move to SAM - Page 2 - For Beginners Only - WIFCON. com
I received a Prime Mod today that is making a CMR CLIN "Reserved" with a note in the Mod stating: "CMR language is being removed from the modification as it is no longer applicable to SBIRs STTRs " Curious of anyone has seen formal notice anywhere exempting SBIRs STTRs from the CMR requirements, or if the above language is the CO's interpretation of the revised requirements
- Reps Certs for Each IDC Order? - WIFCON. com
Assume you are managing an IDC and that the clause at 52 204-19 was included in that basic contract IAW FAR Subpart 4 12, is documenting Reps Certs required in each instance of proposal evaluation order award to the "prospective contractor"?
|
|