|
Canada-QC-KIPAWA Azienda Directories
|
Azienda News:
- javascript - Getting the state with rematch - Stack Overflow
I'm Rematch maintainer, you should review our documentation or consider buying the official Redux made easy with Rematch book where you'll learn all this questions I highly recommend using React-Redux hooks instead of connect method
- Using Rematch Store in React Native - Stack Overflow
Using Rematch Store in React Native Ask Question Asked 3 years, 9 months ago Modified 3 years, 9 months ago
- What is the zsh equivalent for $BASH_REMATCH []?
The manual says about BASH_REMATCH: When set, matches performed with the =~ operator will set the BASH_REMATCH array variable, instead of the default MATCH and match variables The first element of the BASH_REMATCH array will contain the entire matched text and subsequent elements will contain extracted substrings
- Why does BASH_REMATCH not work for a quoted regular expression?
Thanks to your debugging statement, echo The regex matches!, you should have noticed there is no problem with BASH_REMATCH, since the if statement evaluates to false In bash, regular expressions used with =~ are unquoted
- regex - BASH_REMATCH empty - Stack Overflow
Note, however, that if =~ signals success, BASH_REMATCH is never fully empty: at the very least - in the absence of any capture groups - ${BASH_REMATCH[0]} will be defined There are some general points worth making:
- reactjs - RematchJS - how can I access the state in a models effect . . .
I'm using RematchJS and I'd like to access the state in a model effect without sending a payload to the effect The model looks something like this: export const session = createModel lt;RootModel
- bash_rematch and regex (with nested parens) - Stack Overflow
The matching have a strange behaviour, I don't find the other portion of the input string in ${BASH_REMATCH[3]} although is in the 3rd parens of the regex What's happen with nested parens? regex
- Bash regex using BASH_REMATCH not capturing all groups
OP hasn't (yet) stated the desired contents of BASH_REMATCH[] so at this point I'm guessing this is the expected result in this particular case I don't see the need for the additional ? characters in the regex
- Alternative to the `match = re. match(); if match: . . . ` idiom?
Yeah, it would work if the __enter__ code was executed inside the try part that gives the __exit__ code control over the exceptions (because the __enter__ code could then throw a special type of exception that is swallowed by the with statement, effectively stopping any code inside it from executing )
- regex - bash. regexp using bash_rematch - Stack Overflow
I need a regexp using bash rematch to clean possible single quotes or blank spaces before and after
|
|